INTRODUCTION. The applicant complained that the decision to expel him from Denmark had been in breach of Article 8 of the Convention.
INTRODUCTION. The applicant complained that both the criminal investigation into the circumstances of his father’s accident and the proceedings before a pre-trial judge which had confirmed a public prosecutor’s
INTRODUCTION. The applicant complained that proceedings before a pre-trial judge which had confirmed a public prosecutor’s decision not to prosecute an alleged perpetrator had been unfair and had breached his rights guaranteed by Article
INTRODUCTION. The application, lodged under Articles 8 and 13 of the Convention, concerns the publication of the applicant’s personal data on the website of the National Tax and Customs Authority for his failure to fulfil his tax obligations.
INTRODUCTION. The applications concern the alleged partiality of the Supreme Court, in breach of applicants’ right to a fair hearing, in view of its meeting with a representative of the Ministry of Defence.
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 246 December 2020 Mile Novaković v. Croatia – 73544/14 Judgment 17.12.2020 [Section I]
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 246 December 2020 Saber v. Norway – 459/18 Judgment 17.12.2020 [Section V]
INTRODUCTION. The case concerns the applicant’s complaints under Article 3 of the Convention that he was ill-treated at the hands of the police during his arrest
INTRODUCTION. The applicant complained, invoking Articles 3, 9, 14 and 18 of the Convention, that the authorities had failed to conduct an effective investigation into an attack
INTRODUCTION. The case raises issues under Article 8 of the Convention as regards the proportionality of a measure taken against the applicant – namely the seizure of his tablet computer,