The applicants complained under Article 11 of the Convention of the prohibition on holding peaceful assemblies or restrictions on the location, time or manner of conduct of public events.
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF STOROZHUK AND KONONOV v. UKRAINE – 13577/16 and 48768/16
The applicants referred, in particular, to Article 3 of the Convention and alleged that they had been ill-treated by police officers and that the investigation into their complaints had been ineffective.
CASE OF BILOKIN AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE – 3779/14 and 2 others
The applicants complained of the excessive length of criminal proceedings and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law.
CASE OF YESICHKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE – 35659/13
The case concerns the allegedly unlawful and unnecessary eviction of the applicants from a room in a communal flat. European Court of Human Rights FIFTH SECTION CASE OF YESICHKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (Application no. 35659/13) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 8 February…
CASE OF JANOČKOVÁ AND KVOCERA v. SLOVAKIA – 39980/22
In the context of extensive litigation concerning the parents’ rights and duties in respect of the second applicant, the case concerns the length and effectiveness of proceedings for the enforcement of an urgent interim measure (neodkladné opatrenie) regulating the first…
CASE OF BOGDAN v. UKRAINE – waiving of his right to a lawyer had not been valid as he had been suffering from the effects of drug addiction and withdrawal symptoms when he signed it
European Court of Human Rights (Application no. 3016/16) The applicant challenged the validity of the waiver at the domestic level on two other grounds: firstly, on the ground that no lawyer had been present when the waiver had been signed;…
CASE OF BOGDAN v. UKRAINE – 3016/16
The case concerns the applicant’s complaint under Article 6 of the Convention that his right to legal assistance had been breached, notably because his waiving of his right to a lawyer had not been valid as he had been suffering from…
CASE OF M.P. v. LITHUANIA – The case concerns the applicant’s pre-trial detention, his involuntary psychiatric hospitalisation and his allegations of ill-treatment while in detention
European Court of Human Rights SECOND SECTION CASE OF M.P. v. LITHUANIA (Application no. 59063/21) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 6 February 2024 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
CASE OF T.A. v. ARMENIA – The case concerns the applicant’s placement in a psychiatric institution for compulsory treatment
European Court of Human Rights FOURTH SECTION CASE OF T.A. v. ARMENIA (Application no. 2648/22) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 6 February 2024 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
CASE OF MICALLEF AND OTHERS v. MALTA – 50693/20
The case concerns an imposed lease as a result of the application of Chapter 69 of the Laws of Malta whereby the applicants, who co-own the property at different shares, are receiving 203 euros (EUR) per annum (based on the…