Information Note on the Court’s case-law 258 January 2022 Atristain Gorosabel v. Spain – 15508/15 Judgment 18.1.2022 [Section III]
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 258 January 2022 Faysal Pamuk v. Turkey – 430/13 Judgment 18.1.2022 [Section II]
The case concerns the reversal of a judgment of a first instance court by which the applicant was acquitted and his conviction on appeal without examining anew any evidence or hearing witnesses.
The applications concern the alleged unfairness of criminal proceedings against the applicants owing to their inability to examine an anonymous witness at any stage of the proceedings.
The case concerns the applicant’s complaints, under Article 6 § 1 and Article 13 of the Convention, that he did not have a fair hearing and was not able to challenge effectively the lawfulness of the interception
The applicant complains under Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c) of the Convention that he was denied a lawyer of his own choosing whilst being held incommunicado, and that for this reason he made self-incriminatory statements.
The present case concerns a conscript’s suicide as a result of being subjected to hazing practices in the Russian Navy and the refusal of the applicant’s claim for compensation for her son’s death.
THIRD SECTION CASE OF KARUYEV v. RUSSIA (Application no. 4161/13) JUDGMENT Art 10 • Freedom of expression
The application concerns the alleged unfairness of the criminal proceedings against the applicant owing to his alleged inability to confront in person four witnesses who had earlier made incriminating statements about him
SECOND SECTION CASE OF KOVAČ v. SERBIA (Application no. 6673/12) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 18 January 2022 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.