The applicants complained of the non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law.
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF BALDACCHINO AND FALZON v. MALTA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 30806/19
The present application concerns a breach of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention in relation to the disproportionate amount of rent received by the applicants,
CASE OF BARANYI AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 45540/20 and 5 others – see appended list
The applicants complained of the excessive length of their pre-trial detention. In application no. 1552/21, the applicant also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF BUTOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 44272/20 and 6 others – see appended list
The applicants complained about inadequate conditions of their detention and lack of any effective remedy in domestic law.
CASE OF BESIROVIC AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 35503/20 and 5 others – see appended list
The applicants complained of the excessive length of criminal proceedings. The applicants also raised other complaints under Article 13 of the Convention.
CASE OF ZASLONOV v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 4587/20 and 47262/20
The applicant complained of the inadequate conditions of his detention and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law.
CASE OF DESHKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 72209/13 and 2 others – see appended table
The applicants complained of the excessive length of their pre-trial detention. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF AZOVTSEVA v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 64932/12
The applicant complained of the ineffective investigation into the death of her husband, who died in a road traffic accident.
CASE OF ROSSI v. ITALY (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 21844/10
The case concerns legislative intervention in the course of ongoing proceedings. In particular, the applicant complained, under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention,
CASE OF LYSYUK v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 72531/13
The case concerns the applicant’s complaints, under Article 6 § 1 and Article 8 of the Convention, that covert recordings of his conversations had been made unlawfully