FOURTH SECTION CASE OF ALBULESCU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (Application no. 25290/16 and 9 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 22 July 2021
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF PANCHUK v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 14607/16
FIFTH SECTION CASE OF PANCHUK v. UKRAINE (Application no. 14607/16) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 22 July 2021
CASE OF FULGA AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 57392/15 and 9 others – see appended list
FOURTH SECTION CASE OF FULGA AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (Application no. 57392/15 and 9 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 22 July 2021
CASE OF DUBOVYCH v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 47821/10 and 66460/12
The applicants alleged that their home had been unlawfully searched and complained of unavailability of effective domestic remedies for the relevant complaints. They invoked Articles 6, 8 and 13 of the Convention.
CASE OF MAHMUDOV AND AGAZADE v. AZERBAIJAN (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 28083/08
The applicants complained under Article 10 of the Convention that their criminal conviction for publishing an allegedly defamatory article had constituted a violation of their freedom of expression.
CASE OF GUMENYUK AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 11423/19
The present case concerns judges of the Supreme Court of Ukraine who complain that they were unlawfully prevented from exercising their judicial functions as a result of the judicial reform and legislative amendments in 2016.
CASE OF BADALYAN v. AZERBAIJAN (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 51295/11
The application concerns alleged ill-treatment during detention in violation of Article 3 of the Convention and unlawful detention in violation of Article 5.
CASE OF AZER AHMADOV v. AZERBAIJAN (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 3409/10
The application concerns the telephone tapping of an opposition journalist and raises issues, in particular, under Article 8 of the Convention.
CASE OF RECZKOWICZ v. POLAND (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 43447/19
The applicant, who is a barrister, complained that the Disciplinary Chamber of the Supreme Court that dealt with her case had not been an independent and impartial “tribunal established by law” and alleged a breach of Article 6 § 1…
Loquifer v. Belgium – 79089/13, 13805/14 and 54534/14 (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 253 July 2021 Loquifer v. Belgium – 79089/13, 13805/14 and 54534/14 Judgment 20.7.2021 [Section III]