The application concerns allegations raised under Article 3 of the Convention in relation to the excessive use of force by the police against the applicant upon his refusal to present identity papers, as well as of the ineffective investigation into…
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF GECHEVI v. BULGARIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 54909/14
The case concerns the allegedly excessive length of restitution proceedings. It raises issues under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention.
CASE OF ZHELEZOV v. BULGARIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 70560/13
The case concerns a complaint under Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 of the Convention that, in criminal proceedings against the applicant, the court of last instance adopted a new legal classification, without affording the applicant an opportunity to comment.
CASE OF BALLIKTAŞ BINGÖLLÜ v. TURKEY (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 76730/12
The case concerns a specific type of proceedings in which the applicant’s request for the removal of statutory restrictions resulting from a past conviction were rejected.
CASE OF ADZHIGITOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 40165/07 and 2593/08
The applications concern the operation carried out in the village of Borozdinovskaya by the Vostok Battalion in Chechnya on 4 June 2005. The applicants alleged that military service personnel unlawfully searched their houses,
CASE OF S.W. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 87/18
The applicant complains that accusations of professional misconduct made by a Family Court judge in the course of a fact-finding hearing in which she gave evidence as a professional witness breached her rights under Articles 6 and 8 of the…
CASE OF BOYKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 24753/13 and 3 others – see appended table
The applicants alleged that they had been ill-treated by the police and that the investigation into their respective complaints had been ineffective. In addition, one applicant (application no. 57854/13) also raised other complaints under Article
CASE OF TRYAPYSHKO v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 59577/12
The present case concerns the applicant’s complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention that the appellate court had acted arbitrarily when it accepted the respondent’s
CASE OF SHUBITIDZE v. GEORGIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 43854/12
The case concerns the alleged unfairness, within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, of the criminal proceedings conducted against the applicant, on account of the manner in which the principal evidence was obtained and used against…
CASE OF MATTEI AND OTHERS v. MALTA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 14615/19
The case concerns the requisition of the applicants’ property and the disproportionality of the rent received by the applicants under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, as well as the effectiveness of the Constitutional Court as a remedy for the…