The case concerns the applicant’s complaint that the length of proceedings in his pension-related case was excessive and he had no effective domestic remedy in that respect, contrary to Articles
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF KOVRIZHNYKH v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 28943/15
The applicant was convicted and sentenced to imprisonment in the judgment at first instance. Proceedings on appeal in his case were put on hold because the Ukrainian authorities no longer had access to the domestic case file.
CASE OF ILLYASHENKO v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 8562/13
The case concerns the alleged unrecorded detention of the applicant, the justification for his pre-trial detention and the alleged absence of a meaningful review of the lawfulness of his detention,
CASE OF VASILIY IVASHCHENKO v. UKRAINE (No. 2) (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 1976/13
The case concerns: the applicant’s alleged ill-treatment by the staff at a detention facility, and the effectiveness of the investigation into the matter (Article 3 of the Convention); conditions of detention and adequacy of medical care (Article 3);
CASE OF KRAVCHUK v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 77435/12
The case concerns the domestic courts’ duty under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention to provide reasons for their decisions.
CASE OF VEKIC v. CROATIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 68477/17
The case concerns, under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, the seizure of the applicant’s property in criminal proceedings.
CASE OF MALIC v. CROATIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 8402/17
The application concerns the alleged lack of impartiality of a second‑instance court judge, whose husband had been employed with the respondent in the applicant’s case.
CASE OF CUPAC v. CROATIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 8402/17
The application concerns the alleged lack of impartiality of a second‑instance court judge, whose husband had been employed with the respondent in the applicant’s case.
CASE OF CUPAC v. CROATIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 12025/16
FIRST SECTION CASE OF CUPAĆ v. CROATIA (Application no. 12025/16) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 22 April 2021
CASE OF HAJIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 15996/12
The application concerns the applicant’s alleged ill-treatment in police custody contrary to Article 3 of the Convention, lack of effective investigation of those allegations and hindrance in the exercise of his right of individual petition as guaranteed by Article 34