The applicants alleged, in particular, that the various consequences for them of non-compliance with the statutory duty of vaccination had been incompatible
Category: European Court of Human Rights
Venken and Others v. Belgium (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 250 April 2021 Venken and Others v. Belgium – 46130/14, 76251/14, 42969/16 et al. Judgment 6.4.2021 [Section III]
Handzhiyski v. Bulgaria (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 250 April 2021 Handzhiyski v. Bulgaria – 10783/14 Judgment 6.4.2021 [Section IV]
CASE OF M.L. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 25079/19 and 18570/19
INTRODUCTION. The applicants complained under Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention about the risk of death, torture and/or ill-treatment in the event of their forced return to North Korea
CASE OF ZADOROZHNYY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 55025/18 and 12185/19
INTRODUCTION. The applications belong to a series of cases concerning a Russia‑specific issue: a possibility by the State to reclaim real property from a bona fide purchaser.
CASE OF FRENKEL AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 22481/18 and 38903/19
INTRODUCTION. The applications belong to a series of cases concerning a Russia‑specific issue: a possibility by the State to reclaim real property from a bona fide purchaser.
CASE OF OLGA KUDRINA v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 34313/06
INTRODUCTION. The main issues in the present case are whether the domestic courts’ refusal to summon witnesses on the applicant’s behalf breached her rights under Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) of the Convention
CASE OF LIEBSCHER v. AUSTRIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 5434/17
INTRODUCTION. The applicant complains that the obligation to present the entire divorce settlement (as opposed to an excerpt of it) in order to have his share of a real estate property transferred to his former wife amounted
CASE OF HANDZHIYSKI v. BULGARIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 10783/14
INTRODUCTION. The case chiefly concerns the question whether the conviction of the applicant, a local politician, of minor hooliganism in relation to his placing a Santa Claus
Ribcheva and Others v. Bulgaria (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 249 March 2021 Ribcheva and Others v. Bulgaria – 37801/16, 39549/16 and 40658/16 Judgment 30.3.2021 [Section IV]