Information Note on the Court’s case-law 248 February 2021 Stichting Landgoed Steenbergen and Others v. the Netherlands – 19732/17 Judgment 16.2.2021 [Section IV]
Category: European Court of Human Rights
Gawlik v. Liechtenstein (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 248 February 2021 Gawlik v. Liechtenstein – 23922/19 Judgment 16.2.2021 [Section II]
Tikhonov and Khasis v. Russia (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 248 February 2021 Tikhonov and Khasis v. Russia – 12074/12 and 16442/12 Judgment 16.2.2021 [Section III]
V.C.L. and A.N. v. the United Kingdom (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 248 February 2021 V.C.L. and A.N. v. the United Kingdom – 74603/12 and 77587/12 Judgment 16.2.2021 [Section IV]
Budinova and Chaprazov v. Bulgaria (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 248 February 2021 Budinova and Chaprazov v. Bulgaria – 12567/13 Judgment 16.2.2021 [Section IV]
Behar and Gutman v. Bulgaria (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 248 February 2021 Behar and Gutman v. Bulgaria – 29335/13 Judgment 16.2.2021 [Section IV]
Hanan v. Germany [GC] (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 248 February 2021 Hanan v. Germany [GC] – 4871/16 Judgment 16.2.2021 [GC]
CASE OF IALTEXGAL AURICA S.A. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 16000/10
. The case concerns excessive length of proceedings.
CASE OF MANSUROV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 4336/06 and 7 others – see appended list
. The applications concern the alleged ill-treatment of the applicants at the hands of State officials between 2005 and 2012, and the alleged ineffective investigation in that regard, as well as other
CASE OF BUDAK v. TURKEY (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 69762/12
. The application concerns the alleged violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his home under Article 8 of the Convention on account of the search of his house, as well as the alleged unfairness