. The present application raises the issue of whether the Regional Court, which convicted the applicant of murdering her husband out of greed, jointly with G.S., had been impartial as required by Article 6
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF GAWLIK v. LIECHTENSTEIN (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 23922/19
The application concerns the dismissal without notice of the applicant, deputy chief physician of the only public hospital in Liechtenstein, after he had voiced suspicions externally, notably by filing a criminal complaint with the Public Prosecutor’s Office, that the chief…
CASE OF STICHTING LANDGOED STEENBERGEN AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 19732/17
. The application concerns the publication, solely by electronic means, of the notification of a decision to extend the opening hours of a motocross track located in close proximity to the applicants’
CASE OF BULIGA v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 22003/12
. The case concerns allegations that the criminal proceedings against the applicant for a minor offence were unfair, in so far as the court relied on the statements of witnesses whom he had not been able to question.
CASE OF NEGULESCU v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 11230/12
. The case concerns allegations that the criminal proceedings against the applicant for a minor offence were unfair, insofar as the court relied on the statement of witnesses whom she had not been able to question.
CASE OF BEHAR AND GUTMAN v. BULGARIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 29335/13
. The case primarily concerns a complaint, under Articles 8 and 14 of the Convention, that by dismissing a claim brought by the applicants – Bulgarian nationals of Jewish ethnic origin
CASE OF BUDINOVA AND CHAPRAZOV v. BULGARIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 12567/13
. The case primarily concerns a complaint, under Articles 8 and 14 of the Convention, that by dismissing a claim brought by the applicants – Bulgarian nationals of Roma ethnic origin
CASE OF V.C.L. AND A.N. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 77587/12 and 74603/12
. The present applications concern the prosecution of the (then) minor applicants, both of whom were recognised as victims of trafficking by the designated Competent Authority,
CASE OF HANAN v. GERMANY (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 4871/16
PROCEDURE. The applicant alleged that the respondent State had not conducted an effective investigation, as required by the procedural limb of Article 2 of the Convention, into an airstrike of 4 September 2009
Zohlandt v. the Netherlands (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 248 February 2021 Zohlandt v. the Netherlands – 69491/16 Judgment 9.2.2021 [Section IV]