Information Note on the Court’s case-law 248 February 2021 Maassen v. the Netherlands – 10982/15 Judgment 9.2.2021 [Section IV]
Category: European Court of Human Rights
Ramazan Demir v. Turkey (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 248 February 2021 Ramazan Demir v. Turkey – 68550/17 Judgment 9.2.2021 [Section II]
N.C. v. Turkey (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 248 February 2021 N.Ç. v. Turkey – 40591/11 Judgment 9.2.2021 [Section II]
Hasselbaink v. the Netherlands (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 248 February 2021 Hasselbaink v. the Netherlands – 73329/16 Judgment 9.2.2021 [Section IV]
Xhoxhaj v. Albania (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 248 February 2021 Xhoxhaj v. Albania – 15227/19 Judgment 9.2.2021 [Section III]
CASE OF USPANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 48053/06 and 7 others – see appended list
. Between 2004 and 2010 the applicants were arrested on suspicion of belonging to illegal armed groups and having committed crimes of a terrorist nature in the North Caucasus region.
CASE OF LAPTEV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 36480/13
. The present case concerns the applicant’s complaints under Article 2 of the Convention about the events surrounding the death of the applicant’s brother during the latter’s remand in custody between
CASE OF TOKEL v. TURKEY (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 23662/08
. The present application concerns the allegedly unauthorised use of the applicant’s patented invention – namely a conveyor-belt system for drying tea – by a State-owned enterprise and the domestic courts’ conclusion
CASE OF MAASSEN v. THE NETHERLANDS (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 10982/15
. The applicant complained under Article 5 §§ 1 and 3 of the Convention that his pre-trial detention from 19 December 2014 onwards had lacked adequate justification, or in the alternative,
CASE OF ZOHLANDT v. THE NETHERLANDS (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 69491/16
. The applicant complained under Article 5 §§ 1 and 3 of the Convention that the assumed risk of recidivism could not be based on facts from the case-file or circumstances