FIFTH SECTION CASE OF SAYEVYCH AND KOVAL v. UKRAINE (Applications nos. 64547/19 and 11649/20) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 26 November 2020
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF TYAZHKOV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 4672/19 and 14373/19
THIRD SECTION CASE OF TYAZHKOV v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 4672/19 and 14373/19) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 26 November 2020
CASE OF MAKAROV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 4926/18
THIRD SECTION CASE OF MAKAROV v. RUSSIA (Application no. 4926/18) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 26 November 2020
CASE OF SAFIN v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 35877/17 and 2 others – see appended list
THIRD SECTION CASE OF SAFIN v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 35877/17 and 2 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 26 November 2020
CASE OF PRISHCHENKO v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 28563/17 and 2 others – see appended list
THIRD SECTION CASE OF PRISHCHENKO v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 28563/17 and 2 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 26 November 2020
CASE OF MEDVEDEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 46440/16 and 7 others – see appended list
THIRD SECTION CASE OF MEDVEDEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 46440/16 and 7 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 26 November 2020
CASE OF MERCUR SYSTEM A.D. AND OTHERS v. MONTENEGRO (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 5862/11 and 70851/13
FIFTH SECTION CASE OF MERCUR SYSTEM A.D. AND OTHERS v. MONTENEGRO (Applications nos. 5862/11 and 70851/13) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 26 November 2020
Kurban v. Turkey (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 245 November 2020
Unuane v. the United Kingdom (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 245 November 2020
CASE OF KOCAMAN v. TURKEY (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 77043/12
. The case concerns the alleged violation of the applicant’s right of access to a court because of the national courts’ omission to render a decision in the applicant’s case against one of the opposing parties to the proceedings.