The applicants complained about their confinement in a metal cage in a courtroom during criminal proceedings against them. SECOND SECTION CASE OF VINOKUROV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 32706/15 and 49 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 2…
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF YELISEYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA. The applicants complained about their confinement in a metal cage in the courtroom during the criminal proceedings against them and/or during the administrative proceedings to which they were a party
Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the applicants’ confinement in a metal cage before the court during the criminal proceedings against them and/or the administrative proceedings to which they were…
CASE OF KURILENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – 18369/18 and 50 others
The applicants complained about their confinement in a metal cage in the courtroom during criminal proceedings against them. SECOND SECTION CASE OF KURILENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 18369/18 and 50 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 2…
CASE OF PANIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – 14228/18 and 37 others
The applicants complained about their confinement in a metal cage in the courtroom during the criminal proceedings against them. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the applicants’ confinement in a…
CASE OF CHASHCHUKHIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA. The applicants complained about their confinement in a metal cage in the courtroom during the criminal proceedings against them
Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion on the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on…
CASE OF KLYACHKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – 38521/16 and 41 others. The applicants complained about their confinement in a metal cage in the courtroom during the criminal proceedings against them
The applicants complained about their confinement in a metal cage in the courtroom during the criminal proceedings against them. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the applicants’ confinement in a…
CASE OF OKROPIRIDZE v. GEORGIA – 53974/15
The application, lodged under Article 5 §§ 1 and 3 of the Convention, concerns the allegedly unlawful and arbitrary pre-trial detention of the applicant. FIFTH SECTION CASE OF OKROPIRIDZE v. GEORGIA (Application no. 53974/15) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 2 November 2023 This…
CASE OF STOTT v. THE UNITED KINGDOM – 26104/19
The applicant complains that the early release provisions applicable in his case are discriminatory and in breach of Article 14, taken together with Article 5 of the Convention. For these reasons, it cannot be said that, at the relevant time,…
CASE OF BILD GMBH & CO. KG v. GERMANY – 9602/18. Publishing CCTV footage of police arrests without blurring the faces of police officers
The case concerns a court ruling ordering the applicant company to cease publication of CCTV footage of a police arrest without the face of one of the police officers involved being blurred. The European Court of Human Rights in its…
CASE OF KORABLEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – 33771/16 and 17 others. The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of detention during their transport
The Court notes that the applicants were detained in poor conditions during transport. The Court refers to the principles established in its case‑law regarding cramped and defective conditions during the transit of prisoners. It reiterates in particular that a strong…