. The case concerns the alleged unfairness of criminal proceedings against the applicant on account of the courts’ reliance on the testimony of four witnesses examined in the absence of the applicant and his lawyer.
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF GORZKOWSKI v. POLAND (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 65546/13
. The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention of being deprived of his right of access to the Supreme Administrative Court.
CASE OF MAHADDINOVA AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 34528/13
FIFTH SECTION CASE OF MAHADDINOVA AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN (Application no. 34528/13) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 19 November 2020
CASE OF HAJIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 29648/07
. The applicant complained under Article 6 § 3 (c) of the Convention that the domestic criminal proceedings against him had been unfair on account of his absence from the appeal hearings in his case.
CASE OF PANTALON v. CROATIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 2953/14
. The case concerns the applicant’s conviction for a minor offence of failing to declare a weapon, specifically a diving speargun, at border control even though diving spearguns were expressly excluded from the definition of a weapon under the relevant…
CASE OF SHAVADZE v. GEORGIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 72080/12
INTRODUCTION. The applicant complains under Article 2 of the Convention about a death in police custody and the absence of an effective investigation thereof.
CASE OF KLAUS MULLER v. GERMANY (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 24173/18
. The application concerns the compatibility with Article 8 of the Convention of an administrative fine imposed on the applicant, a lawyer. Relying on legal professional privilege,
CASE OF PROJECT-TRADE D.O.O. v. CROATIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 1920/14
. The case mainly concerns the deprivation of property arising from the Government Decision on the restructuring and recovery of a commercial bank depriving the bank’s shareholders, including the applicant company, of their shares,
CASE OF DUPATE v. LATVIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 18068/11
. The case concerns an alleged breach of the applicant’s right to private life under Article 8 of the Convention by the publication of covertly taken photographs with captions that depicted her leaving hospital with her newborn baby
Institution of proceedings – Practice Directions “Rules of the European Court of Human Rights”
(Individual applications under Article 34 of the Convention)