. The case concerns legislative amendments removing the applicant’s usufruct rights over agricultural land. The applicant relied on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention.
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF SZAJKI MEZOGAZDASAGI ZRT v. HUNGARY (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 11100/15
. The case concerns legislative amendments removing the applicant’s usufruct lease rights over agricultural land. The applicant relied on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention.
CASE OF MIFSUD AND OTHERS v. MALTA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 38770/17
. The case concerns the taking and, in connection with certain parts of the land, the eventual expropriation of the applicants’ land, which was originally used for a gas collection plant that was later dismantled,
CASE OF ZAKHAROV AND VARZHABETYAN v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 35880/14 and 75926/17
. The case concerns police ill-treatment of the applicants during a political rally on 6 May 2012 at Bolotnaya Square.
CASE OF KOKSOY v. TURKEY (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 31885/10
. The case concerns an alleged breach of the applicants’ right to adversarial proceedings on account of the Court of Cassation basing its decision on appeal on certain information and documents not submitted to the parties for their comments.
CASE OF ADAM AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 81114/17 and 5 others
. The case concerns alleged discrimination in the baccalaureate (school‑leaving) qualification of pupils belonging to national minorities studying at school in their native tongue.
Muhammad and Muhammad v. Romania [GC] (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 244 October 2020
Akbay and Others v. Germany (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 244 October 2020
CASE OF KABANOVA v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 17317/08
. The application concerns complaints under Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention regarding the ineffectiveness of the investigation into a traffic accident which the applicant survived, while sustaining bodily injuries.
CASE OF STARISHKO v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 61839/12
. The applicant complained about the lack of any genuine prospect of his release and about the restrictions on his right to receive visits in prison from 2000 to 2014.