. The applicants complained that the criminal investigation into the death of their son had lacked diligence and had been ineffective. They relied on Article 6 of the Convention.
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF BORETS-PERVAK AND MALDON v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 42276/15 and 54278/15
. On 26 January 2015 the applicants participated in a spontaneous gathering on Lubyanskiy Proyezd in Moscow to demand the release of captured Ukrainian pilot Nadezhda Savchenko.
CASE OF KARELSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 66856/14 and 33606/15
. On 21 February 2014 the applicants participated in a spontaneous gathering in front of the Zamoskvoretskiy District Court of Moscow where they came to attend a public hearing involving activists who were
CASE OF SVAROVSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 47800/14 and 2 others – see appended list
. On 24 February 2014 the applicants participated in a spontaneous gathering in front of the Zamoskvoretskiy District Court of Moscow where they came to attend a public hearing involving activists who were
CASE OF POKA v. HUNGARY (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 31573/14
. The applicant complained under Article 11 of the Convention that his right to freedom of assembly had been unjustifiably restricted.
CASE OF DANILINY v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 32400/12
. The present case concerns the alleged abduction and subsequent disappearance of the applicants’ relative in Dagestan in 2012, and the ineffectiveness of the ensuing investigation into the matter.
CASE OF DEMIN v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 66314/11
. The present case concerns the applicant’s participation in two demonstrations in 2011 and 2012 and the length of two sets of proceedings.
CASE OF VLADOVSKIYE v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 40833/07
. The case concerns the first applicant’s complaints that he was ill‑treated at the hands of the police in 2004, that there was no effective investigation into the matter,
CASE OF LAGUNA GUZMAN v. SPAIN (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 41462/17
. The case concerns an alleged breach of Article 11 of the Convention as a result of the injuries suffered by the applicant during the forceful dispersal of a demonstration.
CASE OF GRACIA GONZALEZ v. SPAIN (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 65107/16
THIRD SECTION CASE OF GRACIA GONZALEZ v. SPAIN (Application no. 65107/16) JUDGMENT