The case concerns the denial to the applicant of the right to appeal against a lower court judgment refusing his compensation claim for his flat alienated by a local authority.
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF YORDANOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA – 265/17 and 26473/18
The case concerns the forfeiture by the State of assets alleged to have been “unlawfully acquired”, and raises in particular issues under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention. The European Court of Human Rights noted the following:…
CASE OF SARKOCY v. SLOVAKIA – 1971/22
The applicant, a Slovak national, complained of the excessive length of civil proceedings which started on 20 June 2012 when he lodged a claim for damages against the State, complaining that a denial by a court of his claims submitted…
CASE OF POĽNOHOSPODÁRSKE DRUŽSTVO DECHTICE v. SLOVAKIA – 51217/21
The applicant complained of the excessive length of civil proceedings, which it had initiated with several other plaintiffs on 15 July 2014 before the Trnava District Court (‘the District Court’), seeking to have a lease agreement declared null and void.
CASE OF POZEMKOVÉ SPOLOČENSTVO – LESNÝ A PASIENKOVÝ URBÁR (LPU) DECHTICE v. SLOVAKIA – 51197/21
FIRST SECTION CASE OF POZEMKOVÉ SPOLOČENSTVO – LESNÝ A PASIENKOVÝ URBÁR (LPU) DECHTICE v. SLOVAKIA (Application no. 51197/21) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 21 September 2023
CASE OF LEZNYUK v. UKRAINE – 35431/21
The applicant complained of the ineffective investigation into the death of his son without involvement of State agents.
CASE OF ALIYEV AND BABAYEv. AZERBAIJAN – 10084/21 and 19549/22
The applicants complained of the lack of justification for their pre-trial detention. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the domestic courts failed to justify the need for the applicants’ pre-trial…
CASE OF GANBAROVA AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
The applications concern the travel bans imposed on the applicants, who are independent journalists, within the framework of criminal proceedings relating to the activities of Meydan TV, an online media channel with which they had collaborated. Having examined the submissions…
CASE OF MOLDOVAN AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA – 45619/16 and 13 others
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention.
CASE OF BODORIN AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA – 27443/16 and 6 others
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention.