THIRD SECTION CASE OF KHANH v. CYPRUS (Application no. 43639/12) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 4 December 2018 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF DUDKA v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights)
FOURTH SECTION CASE OF DUDKA v. UKRAINE (Application no. 55912/09) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 4 December 2018 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
CASE OF YAKUSHEV v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights)
FOURTH SECTION CASE OF YAKUSHEV v. UKRAINE (Application no. 15978/09) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 4 December 2018 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
CASE OF LAVRINYUK v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights)
FOURTH SECTION CASE OF LAVRINYUK v. UKRAINE (Application no. 1858/08) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 4 December 2018 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
CASE OF LVIN v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights)
THIRD SECTION CASE OF LVIN v. RUSSIA (Application no. 43301/07) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 4 December 2018 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
CASE OF YANDAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights)
THIRD SECTION CASE OF YANDAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 5374/07 and 9 others – see list appended) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 4 December 2018
BACCIOCCHI v. SAN MARINO (European Court of Human Rights)
FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no.23327/16 Livio BACCIOCCHI against San Marino
CASE OF ISAYEVA v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 35523/06
The case concerns the infliction of grievous bodily harm on the applicant by another patient while in a State-run mental institution.The applicant alleged, in particular,
CASE OF MAGYAR JETI ZRT v. HUNGARY (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 11257/16
The applicant company complained under Article 10 of the Convention that, by finding it liable for the posting of a hyperlink leading to defamatory content on its website,
CASE OF ILNSEHER v. GERMANY (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 10211/12 and 27505/14
The applicant alleged, in particular,that his “retrospective” preventive detention (nachträgliche Sicherungsverwahrung; see for the terminology also paragraphs104-106 and 157 below)