The case concerns the requirement that the applicant reimburse the social security authorities for the lost working capacity pension paid to a person whom he had accidently injured.
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF MUKHTARKULYYEV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE – The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law
European Court of Human Rights (34358/16 and 58535/16) The respondent Government chose not to participate in the proceedings and not to submit any documents or arguments in their defence. Accordingly, the Court will need to examine the application on the…
CASE OF AKHMEDNABIYEV AND KAMALOV v. RUSSIA – 34358/16 and 58535/16
The applications concern the murders of the applicants’ relatives and the effectiveness of the ensuing investigations.
CASE OF FERREIRA CAPITÃO AND GIL CARDOSO v. PORTUGAL – 31519/22 and 41866/22
Relying on Article 3 of the Convention, the applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of his detention.
CASE OF A.I. AND OTHERS v. GREECE – 13958/16
European Court of Human Rights FIFTH SECTION CASE OF A.I. AND OTHERS v. GREECE (Application no. 13958/16) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 18 January 2024
CASE OF ISMAYILZADE v. AZERBAIJAN – 17780/18
The present case concerns the refusal of the domestic authorities to register the forename chosen by the applicant for her newborn child.
CASE OF DABO v. SWEDEN – The application concerns a refusal to grant family reunification
The applicant was granted asylum in Sweden on 8 March 2016. On 20 July 2016 Law 2016:752 concerning temporary restrictions on the granting of permanent residence permits for asylum seekers in Sweden entered into force. It introduced, among other things,…
CASE OF KOLOMPÁR AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY – 975/23 and 4 others
The applicants complained of the excessive length of criminal proceedings.
CASE OF NACCA AND OTHERS v. ITALY – 54996/22 and 3 others
The applicants complained of the non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions issued in their favour for the professional services they had performed for the Consortium of the Basin of the Provinces of Caserta and Naples.
CASE OF NAZAREDSKAYA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – 52077/22 and 22 others
The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of nationwide protests against the Russian military attack on Ukraine.