This application concerns, in the main, the allegedly unjustified interference with the applicant’s property rights under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 and her related rights under Article 8
The application concerns, in the main, the applicant’s complaints under Article 6 § 1 and Article 8 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 about the conduct and outcome
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 266 September 2022 McCann and Healy v. Portugal – 57195/17 Judgment 20.9.2022 [Section IV] Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8-1 Respect for private life
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 266 September 2022 Y.P. v. Russia – 43399/13 Judgment 20.9.2022 [Section III] Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for private life
The present case concerns the applicant’s complaints under Article 3 of the Convention relating to the conditions of her detention, the alleged inadequacy of her medical treatment
Mr Orishchenko is the owner of the website domain and a CEO of Region-36, a PR-company providing informational consulting services and publishing information on the website
The case concerns allegedly unlawful and disproportionate deprivation of the applicant’s property, contrary to Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.
The case concerns the allegedly unlawful pre-trial detention of the applicant under Article 5 § 1 of the Convention and the alleged absence of relevant guarantees afforded to her under Article
The case concerns the alleged breach of the applicant’s passive electoral right under Article 3 of Protocol No. 1.
The case concerns defamation proceedings initiated against the applicant for the statements he had made in his complaints to the law-enforcement authorities and before the courts.