The applicants complained of the lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of the prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF BALICKI v. CROATIA (European Court of Human Rights) 71300/16
The applicant complained of the excessive length of civil proceedings.
CASE OF ILIE AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 23993/16 and 13 others
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention.
CASE OF HAMAZASPYAN AND SAFARYAN v. ARMENIA (European Court of Human Rights) 28506/15 and 6728/17
The applicants complained of the unlawful detention.
CASE OF TYURIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 32695/14 and 8 others
The applicants complained of the permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities.
CASE OF SHOPOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA (European Court of Human Rights) 38398/11 and 2 others
The case originated in applications against Bulgaria lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”)
CASE OF KAMPER AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 46043/08 and 3 others
The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
CASE OF GALLO v. ITALY (European Court of Human Rights) 11061/05
The case concerns the deprivation of the applicant’s land pursuant to the rule on indirect or “constructive” expropriation.
CASE OF UGULAVA v. GEORGIA (European Court of Human Rights) 5432/15
The application, lodged under Article 5 §§ 1 (c), 3 and 4 of the Convention, concerns the allegedly unlawful and arbitrary pre-trial detention of the applicant.
CASE OF KATONA AND ZÁVARSKÝ v. SLOVAKIA (European Court of Human Rights) 43932/19 and 43995/19
The applications concern the exclusion from satisfaction in insolvency proceedings or any other proceedings of the applicants’ claims against an individual for payment of money owed on the basis of a set of promissory notes.