Information Note on the Court’s case-law December 2022 Pannon Plakát Kft and Others v. Hungary – 39859/14 Judgment 6.12.2022 [Section I] Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Article 1 para. 2 of Protocol No. 1 Control of the use of…
Category: European Court of Human Rights
Scalzo v. Italy – 8790/21 (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law December 2022 Scalzo v. Italy – 8790/21 Judgment 6.12.2022 [Section I] Article 8 Positive obligations
CASE OF STOYANOVA v. BULGARIA (European Court of Human Rights) 40101/19
The application concerns the delayed provision of compensation to the applicant for her parents’ property which was expropriated for urban development in 1985 by the municipal authorities of Dobrich.
CASE OF HALIL v. BULGARIA (European Court of Human Rights) 40029/19
The application concerns the delayed provision of compensation to the applicant for his property which was expropriated for urban development in 1983 by the municipal authorities of Dobrich.
CASE OF GANCHEVI v. BULGARIA (European Court of Human Rights) 40026/19
The application concerns the delayed provision of compensation to the applicants for their predecessors’ property which was expropriated for urban development in 1983 by the municipal authorities of Dobrich.
CASE OF K.K. AND OTHERS v. DENMARK (European Court of Human Rights) 25212/21
Before the Court, the applicants complained that the authorities’ refusal, upheld by the Supreme Court on 6 November 2020, to let the first applicant adopt the second and third applicants, twins born through surrogacy,
CASE OF KALDA v. ESTONIA (No. 2) (European Court of Human Rights) 14581/20
The case concerns the statutory ban on persons who have been convicted of a crime and who are serving their prison sentence from voting in the European Parliament elections.
CASE OF SUBAŞI AND OTHERS v. TÜRKİYE (European Court of Human Rights) 3468/20 and 18 others
The applications concern the refusal of the domestic authorities to grant the applicants, who were detained at the time of the events, permission to receive visits from their school-age children during the weekends.
CASE OF PANNON PLAKÁT KFT AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY (European Court of Human Rights) 39859/14
The case concerns the alleged interference with the applicant companies’ rights under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention and Article 10 of the Convention as a result of a series of legislative amendments which
CASE OF MNATSAKANYAN v. ARMENIA (European Court of Human Rights) 2463/12
The case concerns the applicant’s alleged inability to have recourse to judicial review of the decision to recommend his dismissal from the office of a judge. The applicant further considered that his dismissal had violated his right to freedom