The application concerns the alleged unfairness of criminal proceedings that resulted in the applicant’s conviction and his having to serve approximately eight years and seven months in prison owing to the domestic courts’ failure to state
Category: European Court of Human Rights
A.D. and Others v. Georgia (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law November 2022 A.D. and Others v. Georgia – 57864/17, 79087/17 and 55353/19 Judgment 1.12.2022 [Section V] Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8-1 Respect for private life
CASE OF KASHIN AND PETKYAVICHUS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 15007/19 and 17123/19
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of detention during their transport.
CASE OF ZHUKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 41323/18 and 2 others
The applicants complained about theirconfinement in a metal cage in the courtroom during the criminal proceedings against them.
CASE OF NOVIKOV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 26023/18
The applicant complained of the unlawful detention (deprivation of liberty).
CASE OF ILYICHEV AND ZUBKOV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 2703/18 and 23642/18
The applicants complained of the secret surveillance in the context of criminal proceedings.
CASE OF SYSOYEVY v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 74779/17
The applicants complained of the secret surveillance in the context of criminal proceedings.
CASE OF MARTYNCHUK AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 69195/17 and 4 other
The applicants complained of the unlawful detention. FIFTH SECTION CASE OF MARTYNCHUK AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (Application no. 69195/17 and 4 other – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 1 December 2022
CASE OF JURIČIĆ v. CROATIA (European Court of Human Rights) 646/17
The application concerns civil proceedings between a State-founded agency and the applicant regarding a real-estate purchase contract.
CASE OF GATAGAZHEV AND LUGACHEV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 43813/16
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of detention under strict imprisonment regime.