The applicant complained that he had been evicted from a flat he occupied as a tenant because he had not paid overdue rent following a judgement delivered by a first-instance court in the framework
Category: European Court of Human Rights
The Karibu Foundation v. Norway (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law November 2022 The Karibu Foundation v. Norway – 2317/20 Judgment 10.11.2022 [Section V] Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Article 1 para. 2 of Protocol No. 1 Control of the use of property
Bakirdzi and E.C. v. Hungary (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law November 2022 Bakirdzi and E.C. v. Hungary – 49636/14 and 65678/14 Judgment 10.11.2022 [Section I] Article 14 Discrimination
N.V. and C.C. v. Malta (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law November 2022 N.V. and C.C. v. Malta – 4952/21 Judgment 10.11.2022 [Section I] Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8-1 Respect for family life
Kupinskyy v. Ukraine (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law November 2022 Kupinskyy v. Ukraine – 5084/18 Judgment 10.11.2022 [Section V] Article 7 Article 7-1 Heavier penalty
CASE OF AKHMEDYANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 11243/17 and 20 others
The applicants complainedof the inadequate conditions of their detention.
CASE OF VIKTOROV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 49592/14 and 5 others
The applicants complained of the lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of the prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
CASE OF KRUGLOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 12283/14 and 9 others
The applicants, who are members of the religious organization “Bozhya Slava” based in Syktyvkar, complained of the various restrictions imposed by the authorities on the location and/or time of public religious events.
CASE OF VITKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 1907/16 and 11 others
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law.
CASE OF YERMOLENKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 27231/21 and 2 others
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law.