European Court of Human Rights FIFTH SECTION CASE OF SALKOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (Applications nos. 13087/17 and 10 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 18 January 2024
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF KOZACHUK AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE – 6295/17 and 10 others
European Court of Human Rights FIFTH SECTION CASE OF KOZACHUK AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (Applications nos. 6295/17 and 10 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 18 January 2024
CASE OF RIZZO STRIANO v. ITALY – 54800/16
The applicant complained of the non-enforcement of the domestic decision awarding him damages for the occupation of his plot of land for the construction of an aqueduct and compensation for the establishment of an aqueduct easement, to be paid by the Reclamation Consortium…
CASE OF YEFREMOV AND TAMKOV v. UKRAINE – 52812/16 and 59051/21
The applicants complained principally that their pre-trial detention had been unreasonably long. European Court of Human Rights FIFTH SECTION CASE OF YEFREMOV AND TAMKOV v. UKRAINE (Applications nos. 52812/16 and 59051/21) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 18 January 2024
CASE OF SIMION AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA – 45802/16 and 21 others
The applicants complained principally of the inadequate conditions of their detention. European Court of Human Rights FOURTH SECTION CASE OF SIMION AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (Application no. 45802/16 and 21 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 18 January 2024
CASE OF RIZESCU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA – 44636/16 and 2 others
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention. European Court of Human Rights FOURTH SECTION CASE OF RIZESCU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (Application no. 44636/16 and 2 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 18 January 2024
CASE OF UGURYAN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – The applicants complained that they had been unfairly convicted of drug offences following entrapment by State agents
European Court of Human Rights FIRST SECTION CASE OF UGURYAN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 40018/16 and 9 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 18 January 2024
CASE OF AGEYEV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE – 39666/16 and 2 others
The applicants complained of the deficiencies in proceedings for review of the lawfulness of detention.
CASE OF FOLEANU v. ROMANIA – 31273/16 and 17 others
The applicants complained principally of the inadequate conditions of their detention.
CASE OF BLEVE v. ITALY – 55807/13
The applicant complained principally of the non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions given in his favour.