The case concerns the adequacy of the domestic authorities’ reaction to a criminal encroachment upon the applicant’s “possessions”, namely a third party fraudulently taking control of the applicant’s company
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF MORARU v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 64480/19
The application concerns the authorities’ refusal to allow the applicant to sit the entrance examination to study military medicine because her height and weight were below the thresholds set by an Order of the Ministry of National Defence
CASE OF GAGGL v. AUSTRIA (European Court of Human Rights) 63950/19
The present case concerns the applicant’s complaints under Articles 5 and 6 of the Convention that the criminal trial against her and her conviction for the attempted murder of her husband was unfair and the detention resulting from
CASE OF MARINA AUCANADA GROUP S.L. v. SPAIN (European Court of Human Rights) 7567/19
The application concerns the applicant company’s complaint that it was not directly served with a summons in the context of judicial administrative proceedings concerning the annulment of a decision announcing a public call for tenders.
CASE OF VERES v. SPAIN (European Court of Human Rights) 57906/18
The present case mainly concerns an alleged violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his family life under Article 8 of the Convention as a result of the excessive length of the recognition and enforcement proceedingsin Spain
CASE OF AYUSO TORRES v. SPAIN (European Court of Human Rights) 74729/17
The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 and Article 10 of the Convention that, while no sanction had been imposed on him in a set of disciplinary proceedings, it had been stated in the decision adopted in those proceedings…
CASE OF VĂLEANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 59012/17 and 29 others
The complaints raised in the present applications, mainly under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, concern administrative and/or judicial proceedings brought by the applicants under various restitution laws enacted in Romania
CASE OF SAURE v. GERMANY (European Court of Human Rights) 8819/16
The application concerns the refusal to allow the applicant, a journalist, to get physical access and consult in person the files held by the German Foreign Intelligence Service (Bundesnachrichtendienst) on U.B.,
Mamaladze v. Georgia (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law November 2022 Mamaladze v. Georgia – 9487/19 Judgment 3.11.2022 [Section V] Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 Fair hearing Public hearing
Vegotex International S.A. v. Belgium [GC] (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law November 2022 Vegotex International S.A. v. Belgium [GC] – 49812/09 Judgment 3.11.2022 [GC] Article 6 Administrative proceedings Article 6-1 Fair hearing