Information Note on the Court’s case-law November 2022 Sanchez-Sanchez v. the United Kingdom [GC] – 22854/20 Judgment 3.11.2022 [GC]
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF M.M. AND Z.M. v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 4669/20
The applicants, a mother and her son, claimed to be victims of a number of incidents of domestic violence and complained that the authorities had allegedly failed to take measures to protect them,
CASE OF TSMOKALOV v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 15524/13
This case essentially concerns the authorities’ failure to provide the applicant with appropriate redress for medical malpractice in State hospitals.
CASE OF MAMALADZE v. GEORGIA (European Court of Human Rights) 9487/19
The present case concerns the alleged unfairness of the criminal proceedings against the applicant, the holding of the criminal trial in camera and an alleged violation of the right to the presumption of innocence.
CASE OF VEGOTEX INTERNATIONAL S.A. v. BELGIUM (European Court of Human Rights) 49812/09
Жалоба касается производства по делу о взыскании налогов и дополнительных сборов, которые компания-заявитель была обязана уплатить.
CASE OF SANCHEZ-SANCHEZ v. THE UNITED KINGDOM (European Court of Human Rights) 22854/20
The applicant alleged that his extradition to the United States of America (“US”) would violate Article 3 of the Convention because, if convicted of the charges against him,
CASE OF BAHTIĆ v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA (European Court of Human Rights) 4034/22
The applicant complained of the non-enforcement of a domestic decision issued in her favour against the City of Zenica.
CASE OF PRYKHODKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 32479/21 and 6 others
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law.
CASE OF PYZH AND DOBROVOLSKIY v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights)
The applicants complained of the deficiencies in proceedings for review of the lawfulness of detention.
CASE OF VDOVIN v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 1387/21
The applicant complained of the inadequate conditions of his detention, which were incompatible with his disabilities, and of the absence of an effective remedy in that regard.