The applicants complained of the excessive length of criminal proceedings and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law.
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF BAYSHEV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 41223/20
The applicant complained of the deficiencies in proceedings for review of the lawfulness of detention and about the lengthy detention on remand
CASE OF FEDAS AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 40045/20 and 3 others
The applicants complained of the deficiencies in proceedings for review of the lawfulness of detention under Article 5 § 4 of the Convention.
CASE OF KARALOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 26314/20 and 4 others
The applicantscomplained that they had been unfairly convicted of drug offences following entrapment by State agents.
CASE OF LATYUK AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 23548/20 and 6 others
The applicants complained of the excessive length of civil proceedings and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law.
CASE OF GUZHVA AND MUKHAMETZYANOV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 8588/20 and 33490/20
The applicants complained of the deficiencies in proceedings for review of the lawfulness of detention.
CASE OF SHKURDIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 42046/19 and 2 others
The applicants complained of the unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses.
CASE OF GULAMOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 27425/19 and 10 others
The applicants complained of the deficiencies in proceedings for review of the lawfulness of detention under Article 5 § 4 of the Convention.
CASE OF ABINYAKIN v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 4695/19
The applicant complained of the unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses.
CASE OF FOROSTYAN v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 58501/18
The applicant complained of the unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine a witness.