The applicants complained of the deficiencies in proceedings for review of the lawfulness of detention. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF TUPIKIN v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 54390/18
The applicant complained of the excessive length of criminal proceedings against him.
CASE OF KONDRASHEV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 45497/18
The applicant complained of the unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses.
CASE OF POPOV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 20298/18
The applicant complained of the secret surveillance in the context of criminal proceedings.
CASE OF MIKHEYEV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 13175/18
The applicant complained of the unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine the key prosecution witness.
CASE OF BIKBULATOV AND NEVOLIN v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 9205/18 and 31367/20
The applicants complained of the deficiencies in proceedings for review of the lawfulness of detention. In application no. 31367/20, the applicant also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF KUZNETSOV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 3079/18
The applicant complained of the restrictions on family visits in pre-trial detention facilities. He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF GOVOROV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 79809/17
The applicant complained about the restrictions on family visits in pre‑trial detention facilities.
CASE OF RUSSJAN v. POLAND (European Court of Human Rights) 79509/17
The applicant complained of the excessive length of his pre-trial detention.
CASE OF SURZHAN AND GULYY v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 74633/17 and 13754/18
The applicants complained of the lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention.