Information Note on the Court’s case-law October 2022 Xenofontos and Others v. Cyprus – 68725/16, 74339/16 and 74359/16 Judgment 25.10.2022 [Section III] Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 Fair hearing
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF XENOFONTOS AND OTHERS v. CYPRUS (European Court of Human Rights) 68725/16, 74339/16 and 74359/16
The case mainly concerns the question whether a criminal trial can be considered to be “fair” within the meaning of Article 6 of the Convention if it led to a conviction based to a decisive extent on accomplice testimony.
M.T. and Others v. Sweden (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law October 2022 M.T. and Others v. Sweden – 22105/18 Judgment 20.10.2022 [Section I] Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8-1 Respect for family life
Bierski v. Poland (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law October 2022 Bierski v. Poland – 46342/19 Judgment 20.10.2022 [Section I] Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8-1 Respect for family life
CASE OF MUSHYNSKYY v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 27182/16
The case concerns the applicant’s complaint under Article 3 of the Convention that he was ill-treated during an emergency fire evacuation in Sokal Prison no. 47 on 27 March 2012
CASE OF TUČS v. LATVIA (European Court of Human Rights) 31876/15
The case concerns a complaint that in domestic proceedings concerning the applicant’s dismissal from his job the domestic courts had failed to address his claim that he had been discriminated against
CASE OF LYSAK v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 52299/14
The case concerns the applicant’s complaint under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 that equipment belonging to her and situated on municipal land had been unlawfully dismantled, for which she had been unable to obtain compensation.
CASE OF LAPSA v. LATVIA (European Court of Human Rights) 57444/19
The case concerns the effectiveness of domestic proceedings concerning the applicant’s allegations under Article 2 of the Convention that her child had died as a result of medical negligence.
CASE OF KORNICKA-ZIOBRO v. POLAND (European Court of Human Rights) 23037/16
The case concerns allegations of a breach of procedural obligations under Article 2 of the Convention, in that the investigation into the death in hospital of Mr J.Z. was not effective, thorough and prompt.
CASE OF M.T. AND OTHERS v. SWEDEN (European Court of Human Rights) 22105/18
The application concerns the Swedish authorities’ refusal to grant residence permits to a mother and her son, who were in Syria, on the basis of their family ties with another son/brother who had been