The applicant complained about his confinement in a metal cage in the courtroom during the criminal proceedings against him. He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF ANDRIYANOV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 9361/18
The case originated in an application against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on 14 February 2018.
CASE OF SAMUTICHEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 7943/18 and 2 others
The applicants complained about theirconfinement in a metal cage in the courtroom during the criminal proceedings against them. They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF RADEYKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 7427/18 and 9 others
The applicants complained of the permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities. They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF SALOIDY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 4973/18 and 10 others
The applicants complained of the unlawful detention (deprivation of liberty). They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF BAKHAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 4806/18 and 2 others
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of detention during their transport. They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF ZAYNETDINOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 3872/18 and 7 others
The applicants complained about theirconfinement in a metal cage in the courtroom during the criminal proceedings against them.
CASE OF ROMANENKO AND SMIRNOV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 81595/17 and 4512/20
The applicants alleged that they did not receive adequate medical care in detention and that there was no effective remedy in that regard.
CASE OF STOLBOVSKIKH v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 77444/17 and 17048/20
Mr Vladimir Stolbovskikh (hereinafter – the first applicant) complained of the inadequate conditions of detention during his transport. The applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF KHUREN-OOL AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 77300/17 and 5 others
The applicants complained of the permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities. They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.