The present case concerns numerous refusals of the Polish authorities to examine the applicants’ requests for international protection, their denied entry to Poland and return to Belarus.
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF PAVLOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 39095/17 and 3 others
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of detention during their transport. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF MASTRYUKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 8346/17 and 24 others
The applicants complainedof the inadequate conditions of their on‑going detention in post-conviction facilities. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF BELYANSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 65026/16 and 18 others
The applicants complained of the unlawful detention (deprivation of liberty). They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF POLITAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 62123/16 and 56059/17
Mr A. Politayev and Mr A. Belyayev alleged that they did not receive adequate medical care in detention and that there was no effective remedy in that regard.
CASE OF NOWAK v. POLAND (European Court of Human Rights) 60906/16
The case concerns subjecting the applicant prisoner to the practice of strip searches and monitoring of his telephone conversations.
CASE OF ZAKHAROV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 47538/16 and 8 others
The applicants complained about theirconfinement in a metal cage in the courtroom during the criminal proceedings against them.
CASE OF TEPLYAKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 31708/16 and 6 others
The applicants complained about theirconfinement in a metal cage in the courtroom during the criminal proceedings against them.
CASE OF TEKHNYUK v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 17112/16 and 2 others
The applicant complained of the permanent video surveillance of detainees in post-conviction detention facilities. He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF BLONSKI AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY (European Court of Human Rights) 12152/16 and 6 others
The cases concern the applicants’ sentences of life imprisonment with the possibility of release on parole once they have served a minimum term of between 30 and 40 years