Information Note on the Court’s case-law 265 August-September 2022 Sergey Sorokin v. Russia – 52808/09 Judgment 30.8.2022 [Section III] Article 10 Article 10-1 Freedom of expression
Pârvu v. Romania (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 265 August-September 2022 Pârvu v. Romania – 13326/18 Judgment 30.8.2022 [Section IV] Article 2 Article 2-1 Effective investigation Article 2-2 Use of force
C. v. Romania (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 265 August-September 2022 C. v. Romania – 47358/20 Judgment 30.8.2022 [Section IV] Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8-1 Respect for private life
CASE OF WELSH AND SILVA CANHA v. PORTUGAL (European Court of Human Rights) 58106/15
The case concerns a judgment given by the Lisbon Court of Appeal against the applicants in relation to three articles published in a local satirical newspaper. The applicants complained
CASE OF KONYA AND SCHREPLER-KONYA v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 37087/03 and 24 others
The case originated in twenty-five applications against Romania lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”).
CASE OF Y.G. v. RUSSIA – 8647/12. The applicant complained that a database containing his health data had been available for sale at a market
The applicant complained that a database containing his health data had been available for sale at a market. He alleged that the database had belonged to the law-enforcement authorities,
CASE OF PÂRVU v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 47358/20
The applicant complained that her husband was killed by the police on 26 September 2009 in breach of Article 2 of the Convention and that the national authorities
CASE OF KORPORATIVNA TARGOVSKA BANKA AD v. BULGARIA (European Court of Human Rights) 46564/15 and 68140/16
The case mainly concerns the question whether a bank whose licence was withdrawn – which then almost automatically led to a judicial declaration of insolvency and an order that
CASE OF IBRAGIMOVA v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 68537/13
The present application concerns the applicant’s conviction in administrative-offence proceedings for using a balaclava during a solo demonstration.
CASE OF TRASKUNOVA v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 21648/11
In the present case the applicant’s daughter died while she was participating in a clinical trial of a new medicinal product intended for the treatment of schizophrenia