The applicant alleged that he did not receive adequate medical care in detention and that there was no effective remedy in that regard. He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF MUKHIN AND BASIYEVA v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 24655/16 and 57261/17
The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table
CASE OF ALLELEH AND OTHERS v. NORWAY (European Court of Human Rights) 569/20
The case concerns a complaint under Article 8 of the Convention relating to the expulsion of the first applicant and its alleged consequences for the applicants’ family life.
CASE OF GROSAM v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC (European Court of Human Rights) 19750/13
The case concerns disciplinary proceedings conducted against the applicant, an enforcement officer, by the disciplinary chamber of the Supreme Administrative Court acting as the disciplinary court.
CASE OF HAŠČÁK v. SLOVAKIA – 58359/12 and 2 others. The three applications originate from various facts linked to a surveillance operation carried out in 2005 and 2006 by the Slovak Intelligence Service (“the SIS”)
In 2011 the existence of that operation became publicly known by its codename of “Gorilla”. The general context of the case, both at the national level and before the Court, is described in the Court’s judgment
P.W. v. Austria (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 263 June 2022 P.W. v. Austria – 10425/19 Judgment 21.6.2022 [Section IV]
CASE OF BISULTANOVY v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 48608/19
The case concerns the abduction and subsequent disappearance of the applicants’ relative Mr Abu Bisultanov in Khasavyurt, Dagestan in 2009 and the ineffectiveness of the ensuing investigation into the matter.
CASE OF SHIRVANIYEV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 22470/18
The case concerns the applicant’s wounding during a counterterrorist operation in Chechnya and the authorities’ failure to investigate the matter.
CASE OF TURAYEVA v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 36255/16
The case concerns the explosion of a mine at a construction site in Chechnya in 2014 as a result of which the applicant’s husband Mr Zila Turayev, who was born in 1956, received lethal injuries
CASE OF BABAYAN v. ARMENIA (European Court of Human Rights) 70491/13
The case concerns the duration and outcome of court proceedings to establish a schedule of contact between the applicant and his daughter following his separation from her mother, and contact during the proceedings.