The applicants, teachers with civil servant status (Beamte), complained, in particular, about the disciplinary measures against them for having participated, during their working hours, in strikes which had been organised by the trade union of which they were members. European…
CASE OF HUMPERT AND OTHERS v. GERMANY – The applicants, teachers with civil servant status (Beamte), complained, in particular, about the disciplinary measures against them for having participated, during their working hours, in strikes which had been organised by the trade union of which they were members
European Court of Human Rights (Applications nos. 59433/18, 59477/18, 59481/18 and 59494/18) At the relevant time, the four applicants were State school teachers with civil servant status employed by different German Länder. They were members of the Trade Union for…
CASE OF KHUNDADZEEBI v. GEORGIA – The case concerns a complaint under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 about the allegedly unlawful revocation of the applicants’ property rights over agricultural plots of land
European Court of Human Rights (Application no. 12549/11) In 2007 reforms were introduced concerning privatisation of land in Georgia. On 11 July of that same year, Parliament passed the Law on the recognition of property rights to plots of land…
CASE OF FRANKOWSKI AND OTHERS v. POLAND – 32589/22 and 2 others
The applicants complained of the excessive length of criminal proceedings and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law. European Court of Human Rights FIRST SECTION CASE OF FRANKOWSKI AND OTHERS v. POLAND (Applications nos. 32589/22 and 2…
CASE OF KRÓLAK AND OTHERS v. POLAND – 5983/22 and 2 others
The applicants complained of the excessive length of civil proceedings and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law. European Court of Human Rights FIRST SECTION CASE OF KRÓLAK AND OTHERS v. POLAND (Applications nos. 5983/22 and 2…
CASE OF FÚROVÁ AND NEVEDELOVÁ v. SLOVAKIA – 1780/22
The applicants complained of the excessive length of civil proceedings concerning a payment due to them after their successful anti-discrimination claim, which they had brought against the State on 29 January 2014. European Court of Human Rights FIRST SECTION CASE…
CASE OF DORONIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – 44105/21 and 29 others
The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. European Court of Human Rights THIRD SECTION CASE OF DORONIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 44105/21 and 29 others – see appended…
CASE OF NIKOGHOSYAN AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA – 4396/21 and 2 others
The applicants complained of the excessive length of civil proceedings. European Court of Human Rights FOURTH SECTION CASE OF NIKOGHOSYAN AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA (Applications nos. 4396/21 and 2 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 14 December 2023 This…
CASE OF STALIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – 2825/21 and 31 others
The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. European Court of Human Rights THIRD SECTION CASE OF STALIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 2825/21 and 31 others – see appended…
CASE OF LYCHKATYY AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE 46933/19 and 2 others
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law. European Court of Human Rights FIFTH SECTION CASE OF LYCHKATYY AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (Applications nos. 46933/19 and 2…