The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.
CASE OF PENDIĆ v. SERBIA (European Court of Human Rights) 37131/19
The case originated in an application against Serbia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on 28 June 2019.
CASE OF OROSZ AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY (European Court of Human Rights) 76862/17 and 9 others
The case originated in applications against Hungary lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.
CASE OF BESEDA v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 60699/11
The case originated in an application against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on 20 December 2005.
CASE OF KLIMIN v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 33126/08
The case originated in an application against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on 9 April 2008.
Lings v. Denmark (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 261 April 2022 Lings v. Denmark – 15136/20 Judgment 12.4.2022 [Section II]
CASE OF LINGS v. DENMARK (European Court of Human Rights) 15136/20
By a final judgment of the Supreme Court of 23 September 2019, the applicant, a retired physician, and member of an association in favour of euthanasia, was convicted of two counts of assisted suicide,
Legal summary – Advisory opinion on the assessment, under Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, of the proportionality of a general prohibition on standing for election after removal from office in impeachment proceedings
Case-law Information Note 261 April 2022 Advisory opinion requested by the Lithuanian Supreme Administrative Court Request no. P16-2020-002 8.4.2022 [GC] Legal summary Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 Stand for election
Advisory opinion on the assessment, under Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, of the proportionality of a general prohibition on standing for election after removal from office in impeachment proceedings
GRAND CHAMBER ADVISORY OPINION on the assessment, under Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, of the proportionality of a general prohibition on standing for election after removal from office in impeachment proceedings
CASE OF MIKLIĆ v. CROATIA (European Court of Human Rights) 41023/19
The case concerns the applicant’s compulsory psychiatric internment following his criminal conviction for intrusive behaviour and uttering threats, which he was found to have committed while lacking mental capacity.