The case concerns the applicant’s allegation of ineffective investigation into medical negligence which, according to him, resulted in the death of his son. THIRD SECTION CASE OF AKSENOV v. RUSSIA (Application no. 13706/08) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 29 March 2022 This judgment…
CASE OF SHERSTOBITOVA v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 14697/18
On 18 September 2017 the Prikubanskiy District Court in Krasnodar fined the applicant, who was married to a Russian national, 2,000 roubles (about 30 euros) for overstaying the term of authorised stay in Russia by several days and ordered her…
CASE OF BURIYEV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 42874/18
The case concerns the applicant’s deportation to Tajikistan despite the interim measure being indicated under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court. THIRD SECTION CASE OF BURIYEV v. RUSSIA (Application no. 42874/18) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 29 March 2022 This judgment is…
CASE OF RAKHMONOVY v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 296/18
The first applicant lived in Russia since December 2013, when he married the second applicant, with whom he has two minor children. The second applicant and the applicants’ children are Russian nationals. The applicants’ family lived in Perm. THIRD SECTION…
CASE OF CHIRIKOV AND NEKRASOV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 47942/17 and 58664/17
On 20 December 2016, at the anniversary of the Soviet security service – All-Russian Extraordinary Commission (Cheka) – the applicants, political activists, made an installation “A new Chekist[1]”. They attached a wooden cross to the base of the bust of…
CASE OF A.J. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 12120/20 and 2 others
The applicants are Syrian nationals and complain that they would face a real risk of being subjected to death or ill‑treatment in the event of their removal to Syria. THIRD SECTION CASE OF A.J. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos.…
CASE OF N.K. v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 45761/18
The case concerns removal of the applicant to Tajikistan, in breach of an interim measure issued by the Court, and the conditions and lawfulness of the applicant’s detention pending removal. Articles 3, 5 and 34 of the Convention are, principally,…
CASE OF VOOL AND TOOMIK v. ESTONIA (European Court of Human Rights) 7613/18 and 12222/18
The case concerns a statutory ban on remand prisoners receiving long-term family visits, despite such visits being generally authorised for convicted prisoners. THIRD SECTION CASE OF VOOL AND TOOMIK v. ESTONIA (Applications nos. 7613/18 and 12222/18) JUDGMENT Art 14 (+…
CASE OF STARKEVIČ v. LITHUANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 7512/18
The case mainly concerns the applicant’s complaints about the right to a fair hearing and right to respect for his private life on account of the use of information obtained during a criminal investigation in subsequent disciplinary proceedings wherein the…
CASE OF LANIAUSKAS v. LITHUANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 48309/19
The applicant is a convicted prisoner who is nearly blind. He complained that, in view of his visual impairment, his detention was incompatible with Article 3 of the Convention. SECOND SECTION CASE OF LANIAUSKAS v. LITHUANIA (Application no. 48309/19) JUDGMENT…