The present case concerns the approach applied by the Czech authorities in fixing the compensation paid to the applicants for the expropriation of their property and the proportionality of its amount.
CASE OF WYSZYŃSKI v. POLAND (European Court of Human Rights) 66/12
The case concerns the domestic authorities’ refusal to grant the applicant compensation for a tenant who had occupied his flat without a valid legal title, which the applicant claimed amounted to interference with
CASE OF ZAYIDOV v. AZERBAIJAN (No. 2) (European Court of Human Rights) 5386/10
The application, lodged under Articles 6 § 1, 8, 10, 13 and 14 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, mainly concerns an allegedly unlawful seizure and destruction of a book manuscript
CASE OF A.M. v. NORWAY (European Court of Human Rights) 30254/18
The application concerns complaints under Articles 8 and 14 of the Convention relating to proceedings between the applicant and her ex-partner, and proceedings against relevant administrative decisions,
Y and Others v. Bulgaria (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 260 March 2022 Y and Others v. Bulgaria – 9077/18 Judgment 22.3.2022 [Section IV]
CASE OF SHUMILINA v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 32128/08
On 9 July 2001 at around 4.30 a.m. officer N. attempted to arrest the applicant’s son and his friend, both young people apparently had been involved in a street fight earlier that morning. They tried to escape. N.
CASE OF RAGIMOVY v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 54611/18
The applicants complained about ill-treatment during arrest and lack of effective investigation in this regard, under Article 3 of the Convention; about the first applicant’s unrecorded detention under Article
CASE OF DAURBEKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 60844/11 and 2 others
The applications concern, among other things, alleged ill-treatment of the applicants at the hands of State officials and the lack of a proper investigation in that regard.
CASE OF CHRISTIAN RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATION OF JEHOVAH’S WITNESSES IN THE NKR v. ARMENIA (European Court of Human Rights) 41817/10
The case concerns complaints, raised under Articles 9, 11 and 14 of the Convention, that the “NKR” authorities’ refusal to register the applicant as a religious organisation infringed its right to freedom of religion
CASE OF FILIPPOVY v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 19355/09
The present application concerns the ill-treatment and death of the applicants’ son, Pte Ye.F., during his compulsory military service, and the subsequent investigation.