THIRD SECTION CASE OF FEDOTOVA v. RUSSIA (Application no. 2064/10) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 1 March 2022 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
CASE OF SALA KHAMIDOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 32267/08 and 3 others
The applications concern the applicants’ alleged ill-treatment by State officials and unrecorded detention between 2000 and 2008 in Chechnya and Ingushetia, and the alleged ineffective investigations in that regard.
CASE OF FENECH v. MALTA (European Court of Human Rights) 19090/20
The case concerns the applicant’s conditions of detention in the Corradino Correctional Facility and whether the Maltese authorities took adequate measures to safeguard the applicant, who only has one kidney, against any potential future Covid-19 infection in the prison.
CASE OF STĂVILĂ v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 23126/16
The applicant complained that the reopening of criminal proceedings against him, and his subsequent conviction, had breached his rights to defence, equality of arms, not to be tried and punished twice for the same offence, and to an effective remedy,
CASE OF I.V.Ț. v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 35582/15
The applicant, aged eleven at the material time, was interviewed without prior parental consent about the accidental death of a schoolmate during a school trip, and the interview was broadcast on television. The higher domestic courts dismissed the civil proceedings
CASE OF ROMANOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 5159/21 and 2 others
The applicants complained about the excessive length of criminal proceedings and the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law. In application no. 22453/21 the applicant also raised other complaints under the Convention.
CASE OF LAKATOS AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY (European Court of Human Rights) 1561/21 and 9 others
The applicants complained of the excessive length of their pre-trial detention. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF HADOBÁS AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY (European Court of Human Rights) 44841/20 and 4 others
The applicants complained of the excessive length of criminal proceedings. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF BAYLO v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights)
The applicant alleged that he did not receive adequate medical care in detention. He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF DATSKOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 14609/20 and 2 others
The applicants complained of the excessive length of civil proceedings and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law.