The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law. They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF GRYSHKO AND KOSHLYAK v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 72970/13 and 12818/16
FIFTH SECTION CASE OF GRYSHKO AND KOSHLYAK v. UKRAINE (Applications nos. 72970/13 and 12818/16) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 24 February 2022
CASE OF KOSINSKYY AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 64471/13 and 6 others
FIFTH SECTION CASE OF KOSINSKYY AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (Applications nos. 64471/13 and 6 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 24 February 2022
CASE OF RUD AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 39701/12 and 9 others
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law. They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF ANTONOV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 72900/11
The applicant complained that he had been denied an opportunity to appear in person before the court in two sets of civil proceedings to which he was a party.
CASE OF LIFINTSEV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 6768/11 and 7 others
The applicants complained of the unlawful detention. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF S.A. v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 7445/21
FIFTH SECTION CASE OF S.A. v. UKRAINE (Application no. 7445/21) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 24 February 2022 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
CASE OF M.B.K AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY (European Court of Human Rights) 73860/17
FIRST SECTION CASE OF M.B.K AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY (Application no. 73860/17) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 24 February 2022
CASE OF MARTYNENKO v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 40829/12
FIFTH SECTION CASE OF MARTYNENKO v. UKRAINE (Application no. 40829/12) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 24 February 2022
CASE OF MASTILOVIĆ AND OTHERS v. MONTENEGRO – 28754/10. The present case concerns the non-enforcement of judgments and court-approved settlements in favour of the applicants against a predominantly State-owned company, which has since become insolvent
The present case concerns the non-enforcement of judgments and court-approved settlements in favour of the applicants against a predominantly State-owned company, which has since become insolvent,