The application concerns allegations that the domestic authorities wrongly assessed the severity of the applicant’s disability, thus depriving him of the possibility of benefiting from a personal assistant, and that the proceedings concerning that assessment had lasted too long.
Šeks v. Croatia (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 259 February 2022 Šeks v. Croatia – 39325/20 Judgment 3.2.2022 [Section I]
Advance Pharma sp. z o.o v. Poland (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 259 February 2022 Advance Pharma sp. z o.o v. Poland – 1469/20 Judgment 3.2.2022 [Section I]
CASE OF ŁAKATOSZ v. POLAND (European Court of Human Rights) 27318/19
The applicant was detained in the course of the investigation which concerned large-scale fraud in four different European countries. Initially, the investigation concerned eleven suspects.
CASE OF RUDNICKI v. POLAND (European Court of Human Rights) 22647/19
The case concerns the allegedly excessive length of the applicant’s detention on remand.
CASE OF MALYNOVSKA v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 74576/13
The case concerns the applicant’s complaint under Article 2 of Protocol No. 7 that she was denied the right of appeal in administrative offence proceedings.
CASE OF MARKOV v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 66811/13
The case concerns the allegedly unlawful and arbitrary invalidation of the election results in the constituency, in which the applicant had initially been registered as the winner (Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention).
CASE OF VLASENKO v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 17863/13
The case mainly concerns the prosecution authorities’ access to the applicant’s banking documents, allegedly in breach of Article 8 of the Convention, and a ban on his travelling abroad,
CASE OF BILOTSERKIVSKA v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 17313/13
The case concerns the alleged breach of the applicant’s passive electoral right (Article 3 of Protocol No. 1) and the lack of an effective domestic remedy in that regard (Article 13 of the Convention).
CASE OF ŠEKS v. CROATIA (European Court of Human Rights) 39325/20
The applicant requested access to the classified presidential records as part of research for a book he was writing on the founding of the Republic of Croatia. The President of the Republic decided not to declassify