The applicants complained of the excessive length of their pre-trial detention. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF SAVINOCHKIN AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 39814/20 and 5 others
The applicants complained of the excessive length of criminal proceedings and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law.
CASE OF ZEJNELOVIĆ v. SERBIA (European Court of Human Rights) 26277/20
The applicant complained of the non-enforcement of a domestic decision given against socially/State-owned companies.
CASE OF KIRTOK v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 26193/20 and 9489/21
The applicant complained of the excessive length of his pre-trial detention. He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF ARYSTARKHOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 22948/20 and 9 others
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF BOGUTA AND TERESHCHENKO v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 13094/19 and 37726/19
The applicants complained of the ineffective investigation into the death of their relatives. FIFTH SECTION CASE OF BOGUTA AND TERESHCHENKO v. UKRAINE
CASE OF KAVKAZSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 76201/17 and 6 others
The applicants complained of the unlawful detention (deprivation of liberty). Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF YEFIMOVA AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 68748/17 and 2 others
The applicants complained of the ineffective investigation into the death of their relative. FIFTH SECTION CASE OF YEFIMOVA AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (Applications nos. 68748/17 and 2 others – see appended list)
CASE OF BILYY v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 11356/17 and 45420/19
The applicant complained of the inadequate conditions of his detention and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law. He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF GÎLICE AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 73408/16 and 8 others
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention. FOURTH SECTION CASE OF GÎLICE AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (Application no. 73408/16 and 8 others – see appended list)