In this case the applicant complained that the review “in the light of newly discovered circumstances” and the eventual quashing of a final and enforceable judgment in his favour
CASE OF APAP BOLOGNA v. MALTA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 47505/19
The case concerns a unilaterally imposed commercial lease under Chapter 69 of the Laws of Malta, in respect of which an insufficient amount of rent (to be paid to the applicant) is provided for by law,
CASE OF HYZLER AND OTHERS v. MALTA (European Court of Human Rights) 45720/19
The present application concerns a breach of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention in relation to the disproportionate amount of rent received by the applicants,
CASE OF SLOBODYAN v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 2511/16
The applicant was convicted of a violation of traffic rules and failure to undergo an alcohol test. Under Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) he complained that he had been unable to examine
CASE OF BRYG-A, TOV v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 75237/10 and 75295/10
The applications concern allegedly defective court proceedings resulting in the allegedly unlawful and disproportionate revocation of the applicant company’s title to a land plot,
CASE OF YAREMIYCHUK AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 2720/13 and 6 others
The present cases mainly concern the applicants’ complaint under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 that the imposition of fines as well as the confiscation in full of their lawfully acquired money following
Standard Verlagsgesellschaft mbH v. Austria (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 257 December 2021 Standard Verlagsgesellschaft mbH v. Austria – 39378/15 Judgment 7.12.2021 [Section IV]
Yakut Republican Trade-Union Federation v. Russia (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 257 December 2021 Yakut Republican Trade-Union Federation v. Russia – 29582/09 Judgment 7.12.2021 [Section III]
Yefimov and Youth Human Rights Group v. Russia (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 257 December 2021 Yefimov and Youth Human Rights Group v. Russia – 12385/15 and 51619/15 Judgment 7.12.2021 [Section III]
CASE OF TEWELDE AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – The present case concerns the administrative removal of the applicants, all Eritrean nationals, to their country of origin despite their claims about a real risk of ill-treatment
The present case concerns the administrative removal of the applicants, all Eritrean nationals, to their country of origin despite their claims about a real risk of ill-treatment,