The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention. FOURTH SECTION CASE OF DICU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (Application no. 30319/16 and 14 others – see appended list)
CASE OF SZÉL AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY – The applicants complained that the measure taken by the Speaker of banning the first applicant’s parliamentary speech had infringed the applicants’ right to freedom of expression
Relying in particular on Article 10 (freedom of expression) and Article 13 (right to an effective remedy), the applicants complained that the measure taken by the Speaker of banning
CASE OF SCOTT BADER D.O.O. AND MILETIC v. CROATIA – The case mainly concerns the deprivation of property arising from a government decision on the restructuring and recovery of a commercial bank depriving its shareholders of their shares
The case mainly concerns the deprivation of property arising from a government decision on the restructuring and recovery of a commercial bank depriving its shareholders, including the applicants,
CASE OF GROMOVOY AND SHAYDULLOV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 24857/15 and 36001/20
The applicants complained of the permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities and about unavailability of an effective remedy in this respect.
CASE OF MALYGIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – The applicants complained of the permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities. They also complained about poor conditions of transport
The applicants complained of the permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities. They also complained about poor conditions of transport
CASE OF YEVDOKIMOV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 42787/11
The applicant complained of deficiencies in proceedings for review of the lawfulness of his detention. He also raised complaints under other provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF GOROZHANKIN AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 13582/11 and 2 others
The applicants complained of the unlawful detention. FIFTH SECTION CASE OF GOROZHANKIN AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (Applications nos. 13582/11 and 2 others – see appended list)
CASE OF ELECTION MONITORING CENTRE AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN (European Court of Human Rights) 64733/09
The applicants complained that the delay in the registration and the subsequent dissolution of the Election Monitoring Centre had violated their right to freedom of association under Article
CASE OF JALLOW v. NORWAY – The applicant sought to be granted parental responsibilities for his child of whom he had never had custody, after the child’s mother had died
The case concerns complaints lodged with the Court under Articles 6 and 8 of the Convention relating to proceedings through which the applicant sought to be granted parental
Derenik Mkrtchyan and Gayane Mkrtchyan v. Armenia (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 256 November 2021 Derenik Mkrtchyan and Gayane Mkrtchyan v. Armenia – 69736/12 Judgment 30.11.2021 [Section IV]