Information Note on the Court’s case-law 256 November 2021 Mironescu v. Romania – 17504/18 Judgment 30.11.2021 [Section IV]
Genov and Sarbinska v. Bulgaria (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 256 November 2021 Genov and Sarbinska v. Bulgaria – 52358/15 Judgment 30.11.2021 [Section IV]
CASE OF MĂTĂSARU v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA – This case concerns the applicant’s arrest and detention for three days followed by his conviction for organising a one person protest in front of the Anticorruption Prosecutor’s Office involving a toilet seat and simulation of using it
SECOND SECTION CASE OF MĂTĂSARU v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA (Application no. 53098/17) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 30 November 2021
CASE OF A.C. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA – The case concerns the adequacy of medical care in detention and the hindrance of the applicant’s right of individual application
SECOND SECTION CASE OF A.C. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA (Application no. 60450/13) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 30 November 2021
CASE OF X v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA – The application concerns the alleged breach of the applicant’s right to respect for his privacy, as a result of the inclusion of information about his past convictions in criminal record certificates
SECOND SECTION CASE OF X v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA (Application no. 43529/13) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 30 November 2021 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
CASE OF COLIBAN v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA – The case concerns the applicant’s detention and conviction for distributing electoral leaflets in the self-proclaimed “Moldovan Republic of Transdniestria”
The case concerns the applicant’s detention and conviction for distributing electoral leaflets in the self-proclaimed “Moldovan Republic of Transdniestria”
CASE OF GOLUB v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA – The case is about the applicant’s compulsory military service in the self-proclaimed “Moldovan Republic of Transdniestria”
The case is about the applicant’s compulsory military service in the self-proclaimed “Moldovan Republic of Transdniestria” (the “MRT” – see for more details Ilașcu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC],
CASE OF BORGOVAN v. ROMANIA – The application, which was lodged on 6 May 2015, concerns civil proceedings brought by the applicant against the Suceava Bar Association’s decision not to grant him admission to the legal profession
The application, which was lodged on 6 May 2015, concerns civil proceedings brought by the applicant against the Suceava Bar Association’s decision not to grant him admission to the legal profession.
CASE OF VEGH AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 13064/18 and 13 others
The present case concerns the non-enforcement of an outstanding judgment given in the applicants’ favour in their capacity as former civil parties in criminal proceedings against the National Fund of Investment.
CASE OF PAL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM – The present application concerns the decision to arrest and charge a journalist with the offence of harassment
The present application concerns the decision to arrest and charge a journalist with the offence of harassment. It raises issues under Article 10 of the Convention.