This case concerns civil defamation proceedings instituted against the applicant, a member of a municipal council, by the chair of an electoral commission following the applicant’s
CASE OF VLADIMIR REGIONAL PUBLIC ASSOCIATION OF REFUGEES AND DISPLACED PERSONS ‘SODEYSTVIYE’ v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 53097/08
THIRD SECTION CASE OF VLADIMIR REGIONAL PUBLIC ASSOCIATION OF REFUGEES AND DISPLACED PERSONS ‘SODEYSTVIYE’ v. RUSSIA (Application no. 53097/08)
CASE OF SPADIJER v. MONTENEGRO (European Court of Human Rights) 31549/18
The present case concerns primarily bullying at work affecting the applicant’s psychological integrity and the failure of the relevant domestic bodies to protect her,
CASE OF IGNAT v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 17325/16
The present case raises issues under Article 6 of the Convention and concerns the alleged unfairness of the criminal proceedings opened against the applicant in so far as the appellate
CASE OF DOLINSKA – FICEK AND OZIMEK v. POLAND (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 49868/19 and 57511/19
The applicants are judges who had applied for vacant judicial posts in other courts but were not recommended for those posts by the National Council of the Judiciary (the “NCJ”). They complained that the Chamber of Extraordinary Review
CASE OF TRETYAKOVA v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 63126/13
The case concerns the effectiveness of domestic proceedings on the applicant’s allegations under Article 2 of the Convention that her mother had died as a result of medical negligence.
CASE OF SHABELNIK v. UKRAINE (No. 3) (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 54806/18
The case deals with the applicant’s complaint under Article 7 of the Convention that the judicial review of his previous conviction had resulted in a new punishment being imposed on him outside the statutory time-limit.
CASE OF PETROSYAN v. AZERBAIJAN (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 32427/16
The application concerns complaints under Articles 2, 3, 5, 8, 13 and 14 in connection with the death of the applicant’s son while in captivity.
CASE OF KHOJOYAN AND VARDAZARYAN v. AZERBAIJAN (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 62161/14
The case concerns alleged violations of Articles 2, 3, 5, 13 and 14 of the Convention in connection with the captivity and treatment of the applicants’ father in the respondent State.
W.A. v. Switzerland (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 256 November 2021 W.A. v. Switzerland – 38958/16 Judgment 2.11.2021 [Section III]