The cases concern the applicants’ sentences of life imprisonment with the possibility of release on parole once they have served a forty-year term.
Šaltinytė v. Lithuania (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 255 October 2021 Šaltinytė v. Lithuania – 32934/19 Judgment 26.10.2021 [Section II]
León Madrid v. Spain (European Court of Human Rights)
The present request concerns the applicant’s request to reverse the order of surnames carried by his minor daughter. At the time of the facts,
Kindlhofer v. Austria (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 255 October 2021 Kindlhofer v. Austria – 20962/15 Judgment 26.10.2021 [Section IV]
CASE OF O.P. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 33418/17
The case is about the applicant’s remand in custody for almost one year in the absence of a reasonable suspicion that she had committed the offence imputed to her.
CASE OF TOPLAK AND MRAK v. SLOVENIA (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 34591/19 and 42545/19
The case concerns the alleged lack of adequate measures to allow the applicants, who had muscular dystrophy, to vote in the 2019 elections to the European Parliament
CASE OF ŠALTINYTĖ v. LITHUANIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 32934/19
The case concerns alleged discrimination on the grounds of age when granting housing assistance and the reasoning provided by the domestic courts for refusing to refer the matter to the Constitutional Court.
CASE OF SERRANO CONTRERAS v. SPAIN (No. 2) (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 2236/19
The present case concerns the revision of the applicant’s criminal conviction after the Court’s finding of a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in its judgment of 20 March 2012.
CASE OF KINDLHOFER v. AUSTRIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 20962/15
The present case concerns principally the applicant’s complaint under Article 2 of Protocol No. 7 to the Convention that he had been deprived of a remedy against
CASE OF AMATO GAUCI v. MALTA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 47045/06
The applicant alleged that his property rights under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention were infringed as a result of a new law which imposed