The present case concerns the revision of the applicant’s criminal conviction after the Court’s finding of a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in its judgment of 20 March 2012. THIRD SECTION CASE OF SERRANO CONTRERAS v. SPAIN (No. 2)…
CASE OF KINDLHOFER v. AUSTRIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 20962/15
The present case concerns principally the applicant’s complaint under Article 2 of Protocol No. 7 to the Convention that he had been deprived of a remedy against the Regional Administrative Court’s decision in administrative criminal matters. FOURTH SECTION CASE OF KINDLHOFER…
CASE OF AMATO GAUCI v. MALTA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 47045/06
The applicant alleged that his property rights under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention were infringed as a result of a new law which imposed on him a unilateral lease relationship for an indeterminate time without providing…
Act XXIII of 1979 amending Chapter 158 of the Laws of Malta – Overview of the Case-law of the ECHR
This Overview highlights judgments and decisions which either raise new issues or important matters of general interest. By means o f Act XXIII of 1979, Chapter 158 of the Laws of Malta was amended thereby, the holders of the utile…
Selygenenko and Others v. Ukraine (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 255 October 2021 Selygenenko and Others v. Ukraine – 24919/16 and 28658/16 Judgment 21.10.2021 [Section V] Article 1 of Protocol No. 12 General prohibition of discrimination Discriminatory refusal to allow internally displaced persons to…
CASE OF CHEMIMART LIMITED v. MALTA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 29567/19
The present application concerns a breach of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention in relation to the disproportionate amount of rent received by the applicant company, and the effectiveness of the available remedies in this regard. Act XXIII of…
CASE OF VINCZE v. HUNGARY (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 44390/16
The applicant complained under Article 11 of the Convention that his right to freedom of assembly had been unjustifiably restricted. FIRST SECTION CASE OF VINCZE v. HUNGARY (Application no. 44390/16) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 21 October 2021 This judgment is final but…
CASE OF MUKIY v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 12064/08
FIFTH SECTION CASE OF MUKIY v. UKRAINE (Application no. 12064/08) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 21 October 2021 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Mukiy v. Ukraine, The European Court of Human Rights…
CASE OF SELYGENENKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 24919/16 and 28658/16
The applicants complained under Article 1 of Protocol No. 12 to the Convention that they had not been allowed to participate in local elections at the place of their actual residence, in which they were registered as internally displaced persons (IDPs).…
Laçi v. Albania (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 255 October 2021 Laçi v. Albania – 28142/17 Judgment 19.10.2021 [Section III] Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6-1 Access to court Domestic court’s continuing failure to assess eligibility for exemption from stamp duty impairing…