The applicants complained of the excessive length of their pre-trial detention. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF AZOVTSEVA v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 64932/12
The applicant complained of the ineffective investigation into the death of her husband, who died in a road traffic accident.
CASE OF ROSSI v. ITALY (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 21844/10
The case concerns legislative intervention in the course of ongoing proceedings. In particular, the applicant complained, under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention,
CASE OF LYSYUK v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 72531/13
The case concerns the applicant’s complaints, under Article 6 § 1 and Article 8 of the Convention, that covert recordings of his conversations had been made unlawfully
CASE OF M.B. v. POLAND (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 60157/15
The case concerns the applicant’s detention in a psychiatric hospital on the basis of an allegedly outdated medical assessment.
CASE OF STANISZEWSKI v. POLAND (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 20422/15
The case concerns the sanctioning of the applicant for having published untrue statements about a candidate in local government elections.
CASE OF MILACHIKJ v. NORTH MACEDONIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 44773/16
The case concerns an alleged violation of the presumption of innocence (Article 6 § 2 of the Convention) during compensation proceedings regarding a car which
CASE OF SAMSIN v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 38977/19
The applicant complained, in particular, that his dismissal from the position of Supreme Court judge and the measures applied to him under the Government Cleansing
CASE OF DEMOCRACY AND HUMAN RIGHTS RESOURCE CENTRE AND MUSTAFAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 74288/14 and 64568/16
The present two applications concern the restrictions imposed on the bank accounts of the applicants and on the freedom of movement of the applicant by the domestic authorities.
CASE OF KAPA AND OTHERS v. POLAND (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 75031/13 and 3 others
The case raises an issue under Article 8 in so far as the State authorities, for a period of over two years, routed extremely heavy day and night motorway traffic via a road unequipped