The case concerns the poisoning of the applicant’s husband, a Russian defector and dissident, in the United Kingdom. The applicant alleges that the killing was perpetrated on the direction or with the acquiescence or connivance of the Russian authorities and…
CASE OF ALIYEVA AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 66249/16 and 6 others – see appended list
The applications concern the applicants’ complaint about the non‑payment of statutory additional compensation for their expropriated properties and raises issues under Article 14 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention. FIFTH SECTION CASE OF…
CASE OF MILOSAVLJEVIĆ v. SERBIA (No. 2) (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 47274/19
The application concerns, under Article 10 of the Convention, the freedom of editorial expression in the context of the functioning of a State-run public utility company, as well as the alleged malfeasance and/or corruption on the part of its director.…
CASE OF KEREM ÇİFTÇİ v. TURKEY (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 35205/09
The case concerns the detention of the applicant in police custody pursuant to an arrest warrant that had been withdrawn one month earlier, and the dismissal of his compensation claim. SECOND SECTION CASE OF KEREM ÇİFTÇİ v. TURKEY (Application no.…
CASE OF BARSEGHYAN v. ARMENIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 17804/09
The case concerns the applicant’s prohibition from holding and participating in a rally and his being subjected to an administrative penalty for disobeying the orders of police officers. It raises issues under Article 11 of the Convention. FOURTH SECTION CASE…
CASE OF DARESKIZB LTD v. ARMENIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 61737/08
The present case concerns a ban on publication of a newspaper published by the applicant company as a result of a state of emergency declared in Yerevan on 1 March 2008 for a period of 20 days, including the derogation…
Resolution CM/ResChS(2013)16: Collective Complaint No. 75/2011, International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) v. Belgium
Resolution CM/ResChS(2013)16 Collective Complaint No. 75/2011 International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) v. Belgium (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 16 October 2013 at the 1181st meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies) The Committee of Ministers,[1] Having regard to Article…
2nd assessment of the follow-up (2017): Swedish Trade Union Confederation (LO) and Swedish Confederation of Professional Employees (TCO) v. Sweden, Complaint No. 85/2012
Swedish Trade Union Confederation (LO) and Swedish Confederation of Professional Employees (TCO) v. Sweden, Complaint No. 85/2012, decision on the merits of 3 July 2013 A. Violation of Article 6§2 of the Charter 1. Decision of the Committee on the…
Decision on admissibility and the merits: Swedish Trade Union Confederation (LO) and Swedish Confederation of Professional Employees (TCO) v. Sweden, Complaint No. 85/2012
EUROPEAN COMMITTEE OF SOCIAL RIGHTS. PDF, WORD. DECISION ON ADMISSIBILITY AND THE MERITS Adoption: 3 July 2013 Notification: 19 July 2013 Publicity: 5 February 2014 Swedish Trade Union Confederation (LO) and Swedish Confederation of Professional Employees (TCO) v. Sweden Complaint…
Assessment of the follow-up: Swedish Trade Union Confederation (LO) and Swedish Confederation of Professional Employees (TCO) v. Sweden, Complaint No. 85/2012
Swedish Trade Union Confederation (LO) and Swedish Confederation of Professional Employees (TCO) v. Sweden, Complaint No. 85/2012, decision on the merits of 3 July 2013 A. Violation of Article 6§2 of the Charter 1. Decision of the Committee on the…