3d assessment of follow-up: Conference of European Churches (CEC) v. the Netherlands, Complaint No. 90/2013, decision on the merits of 1 July 2014,
CASE OF PODYAPOLSKYY AND SULYMA v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 38946/20 and 52648/20
FIFTH SECTION CASE OF PODYAPOLSKYY AND SULYMA v. UKRAINE (Applications nos. 38946/20 and 52648/20) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 16 September 2021
CASE OF BAS AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 21865/20 and 3 others – see appended list
FIFTH SECTION CASE OF BAS AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (Application no. 21865/20 and 3 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 16 September 2021
CASE OF GERASHCHENKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 9219/20 and 3 others – see appended list
FIFTH SECTION CASE OF GERASHCHENKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (Applications nos. 9219/20 and 3 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 16 September 2021
CASE OF KOCHURA AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 7925/20 and 9 others ‑ see appended list
FIFTH SECTION CASE OF KOCHURA AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (Applications nos. 7925/20 and 9 others ‑ see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 16 September 2021
CASE OF YERYOMENKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 59600/19 and 2 others – see appended list
FIFTH SECTION CASE OF YERYOMENKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (Application no. 59600/19 and 2 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 16 September 2021
CASE OF POLISHCHUK AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 6648/14 and 3 others – see appended table
The applicants alleged, in particular, under Article 3 of the Convention that they had been ill-treated by the police and that the investigation into their respective complaints was ineffective.
CASE OF LUTAYENKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 1781/14 and 4 others – see appended table
The applicants alleged, in particular, under Article 3 of the Convention, that they had been ill-treated by the police and that the investigation into their respective complaints had been ineffective.
CASE OF ALIZADA AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 1100/14 and 2 others – see appended table
The applicants alleged, in particular, under Article 3 of the Convention that they had been ill-treated by the police. Two applicants (applications nos. 1100/14 and 71568/14)
CASE OF MAKARENKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 53747/09 and 4 others – see appended table
The applicants alleged, in particular, under Article 3 of the Convention, that they had been ill-treated by the police and that the investigation into their respective complaints was ineffective.