THIRD SECTION CASE OF KHAMASTKHANOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 1164/12 and 20 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 8 July 2021
CASE OF BORODOKIN v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 63614/11
THIRD SECTION CASE OF BORODOKIN v. RUSSIA (Application no. 63614/11) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 8 July 2021
CASE OF YEVSYUKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 39224/10 and 6 others – see appended list
THIRD SECTION CASE OF YEVSYUKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 39224/10 and 6 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 8 July 2021
CASE OF PANOVA AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 28519/10 and 3 others – see appended table
The applicants alleged that they had been unlawfully and unfairly evicted from their flats in a building formerly belonging to a State-owned company after it had been transferred to a private owner.
CASE OF BANDURA v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 659/10
The case concerns complaints under Article 2 of the Convention regarding the ineffectiveness of the investigation into the contract killing of the applicant’s husband.
CASE OF HASANOV v. AZERBAIJAN (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 52584/09
The application concerns the criminal conviction of the applicant, a journalist and chief editor of a newspaper, for publishing two articles concerning a female war veteran. The applicant invoked Articles 6 and 10 of the Convention.
CASE OF SALMANOVA v. AZERBAIJAN (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 12098/09
The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention about the alleged non‑enforcement of a final domestic judgment in her favour and under Article 34 of the Convention
CASE OF SILI v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 42903/14
The case concerns the material conditions of the applicant’s detention in Romny Prison no. 56 (Article 3 of the Convention) and his unsuccessful attempts to obtain a disability pension in detention (Article 1 of Protocol No. 1).
CASE OF BERLIZEV v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 43571/12
The case principally concerns the applicant’s allegations under Article 8 of the Convention that the police had unlawfully recorded him and under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that his conviction of the offence of taking a bribe had been based on…
CASE OF D.A. AND OTHERS v. POLAND (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 51246/17
The case concerns alleged pushbacks of the applicants – Syrian nationals – at the Polish-Belarusian border. The applicants alleged that the Polish authorities had repeatedly denied them the possibility of lodging applications for international protection,