The case concerns the applicant’s complaints under Article 3 of the Convention about the conditions of his detention and of his transportation between the detention facility and the court and the adequacy of his medical treatment while in detention,
Centrum för rättvisa v. Sweden [GC] (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 251 May 2021 Centrum för rättvisa v. Sweden [GC] – 35252/08 Judgment 25.5.2021 [GC]
Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC] (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 251 May 2021 Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC] – 58170/13, 62322/14 and 24960/15 Judgment 25.5.2021 [GC]
CASE OF NECHAY v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 40639/17
The present case concerns the decision of the Russian courts to limit the applicant’s contact with his daughter to twelve hours per year, at the child’s place of residence and in the presence of the child’s mother, upon prior agreement…
CASE OF MILOSAVLJEVIĆ v. SERBIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 57574/14
SECOND SECTION CASE OF MILOSAVLJEVIĆ v. SERBIA (Application no. 57574/14) JUDGMENT Art 10 • Freedom of expression
CASE OF CENTRUM FÖR RÄTTVISA v. SWEDEN (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 35252/08
The applicant alleged that the Swedish legislation and practice in the field of signals intelligence violated its rights under Article 8 of the Convention and that it did not have an effective remedy in this regard, contrary to Article 13…
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 58170/13, 62322/14 and 24960/15
The applicants complained about the scope and magnitude of the electronic surveillance programmes operated by the Government of the United Kingdom.
CASE OF ASANOVIC v. MONTENEGRO (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 52415/18
The present case concerns the applicant’s alleged unlawful deprivation of liberty and a lack of an effective domestic remedy in that regard. He relied on Articles 5 § 1 and 13 of the Convention.
CASE OF ATIMA LIMITED v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 56714/11
The case concerns the applicant company’s complaint under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 about interference with its property title to some of the shares in company K.
Beg S.p.a. v. Italy (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 251 May 2021 Beg S.p.a. v. Italy – 5312/11 Judgment 20.5.2021 [Section I]